|
-Matt Ball
Have you ever been in so much pain that you thought
you were going to die?
Have you ever suffered so much that you wanted
to die?
Every year, hundreds of millions of individuals in
the U.S. do suffer to death. Slowly. Excruciatingly.
Egg-laying hens packed in tiny cages, unable to move
because of how crowded they are, can have their toes
literally grow around the wire mesh of the cage floor,
keeping them from getting to food or water.
Pigs, transported hundreds and hundreds of miles
in all weather in open trucks without food or water
– can freeze to death.
Chickens raised for meat, bred to grow so large so
fast that their legs break under their own weight,
leaving them incapacitated and unable to get food.
Vegan Outreach leafleter Wayne Hsiung described
watching a downed dairy cow’s last few moments:
An hour before I was planning to leaflet, a friend
of mine called and said that he had spotted a stalled
transport truck with a downed dairy cow inside.
I arrived to witness a grisly scene. The poor girl
was collapsed on the ground inside the truck, in
a 3-inch-deep cesspool of feces and urine. You could
see her wide, terrified eyes staring into nothingness,
her entire body quivering ever so slightly. But
she was making no sounds. The other cows had trampled
her broken body; she had bloody wounds and bright
red lesions that were clearly visible through the
filth. Her udder was swollen to many times its normal
size. We noticed a ghastly sliver of flesh on a
gate mechanism above her. (It was later suggested
to us that this might have been her tongue. Cows
tend to lick the sides of the truck in search of
moisture, but when it's a frozen mechanized gate,
that desperate attempt can have tragic consequences.)
Our poor friend died that day, on the filthy floor
of a bloody transport truck. We witnessed her body
go cold, and her eyes stop moving. Her entire life
had been enslaved and twisted by violence and prejudice.
Words cannot convey the horrifying conditions that
bring about these slow, agonizing deaths – how
the animals are bred, how they “live”
on factory farms, and, for those who survive the brutal
system, how they are butchered in industrial slaughterhouses.
No verbal or even video description can begin to capture
it; even visiting these confinement warehouses and
slaughterhouses can’t begin to convey what it
is like to live one’s entire life there, to
be callously killed in the end.
It is enough to know that modern agribusiness is
so inherently brutal that it will kill off, pre-slaughterhouse,
hundreds of millions of animals through slow, agonizing
means, simply as a cost of doing business. This is
a system of cruelty so vast, so intense, that it really
is beyond comprehension. As Michael Pollan wrote in
the New York Times:
More than any other institution, the American industrial
animal farm offers a nightmarish glimpse of what
capitalism can look like in the absence of moral
or regulatory constraint. Here in these places life
itself is redefined—as protein production—and
with it suffering. That venerable word becomes “stress,”
an economic problem in search of a cost-effective
solution, like tail-docking or beak-clipping....
Our own worst nightmare such a place may well be;
it is also real life for the billions of animals
unlucky enough to have been born beneath these grim
steel roofs, into the brief, pitiless life of a
“production unit....”
This is the system we endorse and support when we
purchase its products. Consuming flesh foods from
modern agribusiness not only pays others to exploit
and butcher fellow feeling beings; it not only affirms
the view of animals as unconsidered cogs in the machine
of profit; but our purchases are what give agribusiness
the resources needed to grow and brutalize more of
our fellows.
This is enough to compel me to be a vegetarian, to
make a daily, public statement against the breathtaking
viciousness behind meat, eggs, and dairy.
For me, being a vegetarian is not the conclusion
of an impartial set of utilitarian calculations, nor
the endorsement of “animal rights.” Rather,
being a vegetarian is a statement about the person
I want to be: that I could not live with myself if
I were to be a part of such unwatchable cruelty to
animals. The phrase is: How could I look at myself
in the mirror? And that is literally how it happened
for me – looking in the mirror and realizing
I couldn’t consider myself a “good person”
if I continued to pay others to brutalize animals
so I could eat them.
But of course, not everyone makes this choice. With
factory farms concealed and society structured around
eating faceless meat, we can easily refuse to take
a stand and set ourselves apart. And if confronted
with the hidden realities of modern agribusiness,
we can seek out the “less bad” and call
it good.
For example: Michael Pollan, quoted earlier, not
only isn’t a vegetarian – he actively
mocks the “moral certainty” of vegetarians.
He fabricates fantastic rationalizations to continue
eating animals. For example, he says that thinking
in terms of individual animals is human-centric, and
that we need to think in terms of species’ interests.
Of course, this is exactly backwards. “Species”
is a human construct, an abstraction that inherently
can’t have interests. Only individuals have
the capacity to experience pleasure or suffer pain
and thus have interests. That we should eat the flesh
of our fellows to advance the “interests”
of a species is so absurd, such a perfect inversion
of reality that it is truly stunning that an otherwise
seemingly intelligent person would be willing to spout
such ridiculous nonsense. Pollan is the perfect example
of Cleveland Amory’s observation that people
have an infinite capacity to rationalize, especially
when it comes to something they want to eat.
(This may seem an unnecessarily harsh condemnation
of a man who at least is willing to write about factory
farms. But Pollan not only mocks vegetarians via laughable
strawman arguments, he even rationalizes the brutal
act of force-feeding geese to create foie gras! This
level of repulsive rationalization should be exposed
for what it is.)
Pollan’s unwillingness to seriously consider
vegetarianism, combined with his firsthand experience
of “our own worst nightmare,” leads his
rationalizing capacity to praise “happy”
meat from “humane” farms. Having had the
time and resources to investigate the various farms
available, the pinnacle of Pollan’s praise is
Pollyface farm, where “animals can be animals,”
living, according to Pollan, true to their nature.
So what is Pollyface like? Rabbits on the farm are
kept in small suspended-wire cages. Chickens are crowded
into mobile wire cages, confined without the ability
to nest or the space to establish a pecking order.
Pigs and cattle are shipped year-round in open trucks
to conventional slaughterhouses. Seventy-two hours
before their slaughter, birds are crated with seven
other birds. After three days without food, they are
grabbed by the feet, up-ended in metal cones, and,
without any stunning, have their throats slit.
This is the system Pollan proclaims praiseworthy.
While mocking vegetarians, he argues we should ethically
and financially endorse Pollyface’s view and
treatment of animals.
But really, how can we expect better? In the end,
Pollyface’s view is the same as Tyson’s
– that these individual animals are, ultimately,
just meat to be sold for a profit. It is logically
and emotionally impossible for there to be any real
respect, any true, fundamental concern for
the interests of these individuals when these living,
breathing animals exist only to be butchered and consumed.
If we insist that we must consume actual animal flesh
instead of a vegetarian option, it is naïve,
at best, to believe that any system will really
take good care of the animals we pay them to slaughter.
If you say an individual is just meat, they will be
treated as such.
In the end, it really is a question of what kind
of person we choose to be. Or, to think about it another
way – what is the narrative of our life? Is
it that we oppose cruelty or support slaughter? Do
we make our own decisions or do we rationalize what
we’re used to doing?
I believe there are more important things in life
than accepting the status quo, following
the norms of society, and taking the easiest path.
Furthermore, choosing the road less traveled does
not necessitate denial and deprivation. Making our
lives a part of something larger expands
our life’s narrative, enriches our existence,
and allows for real meaning and lasting happiness.
Writing our own narrative frees us from the
constraints of the “norm.” Choosing to
be a vegetarian makes a public, powerful, ethical
statement – not just about the suffering of
animals, but about the strength of our character.
(I discuss this in more detail in “A
Meaningful Life.”)
I ask you to consider one more thing.
The average American consumes about three dozen land
animals every year. By choosing to be a vegetarian,
you will accomplish a great deal of good over the
course of your life – you will spare many hundreds
of animals from the malicious maws of modern agribusiness.
But get this: Tomorrow, you could accomplish much
more, in just one hour!
This may sound like an informercial scam, but it
is true – for every person you convince to go
vegetarian, you double the impact of your
life’s choices. So, if tomorrow you hand out
60 booklets to new people, and just one person decides
to go vegetarian, you will have saved, in only one
hour, just as many animals as you will save with every
single choice you make over the rest of your life.
In other words, if we agree that being a vegetarian
is important, that standing up and speaking out for
the animals and for ourselves is crucial, then we
must also recognize that being an effective advocate
for the animals is many times more important.
Efficient outreach has truly enormous potential; if
you think compound interest is a good deal, effective
vegetarian advocacy allows for exponential returns!
In his book, Meat Market, Erik Marcus writes:
When I was a teenager, my greatest ambition was
to one day be a millionaire. [Later] I adapted the
millionaire concept for purposes of activism....
I wanted to [keep] a million animals out of slaughterhouses....
But is it realistic to think that a typical person
could keep a million animals from slaughter? Absolutely!
... At two thousand [land] animals saved per new
vegetarian, this means that during your life, if
you convince five hundred young people to become
vegetarian, a million animals will be saved.
With a reasonable level of investment, each one of
us can do this. You don’t need to start a group.
You don’t need to pass a law. You just need
to make the choice to join with the others who are
writing their own narrative, who are working for something
bigger than just themselves. We can provide you with
lessons from decades of experience and all the tools
you need. Vegan Outreach exists to help everyone and
anyone, in every situation, be the most effective
advocate possible for the animals – for a world
not just a bit less bad, but for a fundamentally
better world.
Leaflets don’t print themselves, however. Vegan
Outreach is dependent upon the financial support of
those who recognize the importance of effective advocacy.
There are many demands on our limited time and money,
and we must choose to invest our scarce resources
to do the most good. Working to expose and end the
hidden horrors of factory farms is, we believe, the
best possible investment. Every new vegetarian pays
dividends every year, in terms of their food choices
and the example they set for others.
In 2007, Vegan Outreach distributed 1.8 million booklets
– 56% more than 2006. This was only possible
because, from fiscal year 2006 to 2007, contributions
to Vegan Outreach also rose exactly 56%.
A donation today will lead to more booklets to more
people tomorrow, which will lead to new vegetarians
and myriad animals spared this year and every year!
In the end, in our hearts, we know that, regardless
of what we think of ourselves, our actions
reveal the kind of person we really
are. We each determine our life’s narrative.
We can, like most, choose to allow the narrative to
be imposed on us, mindlessly accept the current default,
follow the crowd, and take whatever we can.
Or we can actively author our lives, determining
for ourselves what is important. We can live
with a larger purpose, dedicated to a better world
for all.
The choice is fundamental. The choice is vital. And
the choice is ours.
|